<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Updated News &#187; Cyber Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://updatedfrequently.com/category/cyber-security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://updatedfrequently.com</link>
	<description>News about everything and everyone.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<cloud domain='updatedfrequently.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Government Looking For 10,000 Geeks</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-government-looking-for-10000-geeks</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-government-looking-for-10000-geeks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China S Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Servant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emptive Strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kremlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S News And World Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn5BWd9nooI/AAAAAAAANC8/lQ97k86DzbQ/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px;text-align: center;cursor: pointer;width: 400px;height: 300px" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn5BWd9nooI/AAAAAAAANC8/lQ97k86DzbQ/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><div style="text-align: center"><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%">Government Recruits Geeks to Blunt Cybersecurity Threats -- U.S. News And World Report</span><br /></div><br /><span style="font-style: italic">The U.S. Cyber Challenge aims to identify 10,000 patriotic geeks and make them experts.<br /></span><br />The potential threats against the United States from malicious foreign hackers are as poorly understood as they are scary. China's military has trained more than 60,000 "information troops," and its official doctrine calls for pre-emptive strikes on networks of nations it sees as a threat. Russian hackers—probably with Kremlin support—have attacked Internet sites in pro-Western Estonia and Georgia. And a mysterious "worm," Conficker, infects an estimated 5 million computers around the world. Authorities don't know who controls it; cyberintelligence expert Jeffrey Carr calls it "the equivalent of a nuclear bomb" that could shut down the entire Internet.<br /><a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2009/08/06/government-recruits-geeks-to-blunt-cybersecurity-threats.html"><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">Read more</span></a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">My Comment</span>: Join the Government's call, and get paid like a civil servant .... or .... join the private sector and get an increase in pay with stock options.<br /><br />Hmmmm .... the government cannot compete.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-government-looking-for-10000-geeks">U.S. Government Looking For 10,000 Geeks</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn5BWd9nooI/AAAAAAAANC8/lQ97k86DzbQ/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn5BWd9nooI/AAAAAAAANC8/lQ97k86DzbQ/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367799660128215682" border="0" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >Government Recruits Geeks to Blunt Cybersecurity Threats &#8212; U.S. News And World Report</span></div>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">The U.S. Cyber Challenge aims to identify 10,000 patriotic geeks and make them experts.<br /></span><br />The potential threats against the United States from malicious foreign hackers are as poorly understood as they are scary. China&#8217;s military has trained more than 60,000 &#8220;information troops,&#8221; and its official doctrine calls for pre-emptive strikes on networks of nations it sees as a threat. Russian hackers—probably with Kremlin support—have attacked Internet sites in pro-Western Estonia and Georgia. And a mysterious &#8220;worm,&#8221; Conficker, infects an estimated 5 million computers around the world. Authorities don&#8217;t know who controls it; cyberintelligence expert Jeffrey Carr calls it &#8220;the equivalent of a nuclear bomb&#8221; that could shut down the entire Internet.<br /><a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2009/08/06/government-recruits-geeks-to-blunt-cybersecurity-threats.html" rel='nofollow'><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Read more</span></a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment</span>: Join the Government&#8217;s call, and get paid like a civil servant &#8230;. or &#8230;. join the private sector and get an increase in pay with stock options.</p>
<p>Hmmmm &#8230;. the government cannot compete.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-7274981679150539492?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-government-looking-for-10000-geeks" rel='nofollow'>U.S. Government Looking For 10,000 Geeks</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-government-looking-for-10000-geeks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Top Cyber Security Official Resigns</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/another-top-cyber-security-official-resigns</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/another-top-cyber-security-official-resigns#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Emergency Readiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Computer Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mischel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstacles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phrase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prioritization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readiness Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resignation Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn3cJdbIrUI/AAAAAAAANBo/SH1EvAvAVbc/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt;float: left;cursor: pointer;width: 243px;height: 81px" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn3cJdbIrUI/AAAAAAAANBo/SH1EvAvAVbc/s320/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%"><span style="font-weight: bold">Cybersecurity Official Resigns -- Washington Post</span></span><br /></div><br /><span style="font-style: italic">Obstacles and Lack of Authority Frustrated Director, Sources Say.</span><br /><br />A top operational official in charge of protecting civilian government computer networks has resigned, dealing another blow to the federal effort to enhance cybersecurity.<br /><br />Mischel Kwon, the director of the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, submitted her resignation letter this week. "Moving on is a hard step for me, but one I must take," she said, according to the letter obtained by The Washington Post.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080702805.html">Read more</a><span style="font-weight: bold"> </span>....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">My Comment:</span> The key phrase in this story is the following:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic">Two months after President Obama pledged to "personally" select someone to be the White House's cybersecurity coordinator, the position remains unfilled. </span><br /><br />This symbolizes a lack of focus and prioritization .... why stick around when there is more focus, prioritization, and money in the private sector.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/another-top-cyber-security-official-resigns">Another Top Cyber Security Official Resigns</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn3cJdbIrUI/AAAAAAAANBo/SH1EvAvAVbc/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 243px; height: 81px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sn3cJdbIrUI/AAAAAAAANBo/SH1EvAvAVbc/s320/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367688385970875714" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cybersecurity Official Resigns &#8212; Washington Post</span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Obstacles and Lack of Authority Frustrated Director, Sources Say.</span></p>
<p>A top operational official in charge of protecting civilian government computer networks has resigned, dealing another blow to the federal effort to enhance cybersecurity.</p>
<p>Mischel Kwon, the director of the Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, submitted her resignation letter this week. &#8220;Moving on is a hard step for me, but one I must take,&#8221; she said, according to the letter obtained by The Washington Post.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080702805.html" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span>&#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> The key phrase in this story is the following:</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Two months after President Obama pledged to &#8220;personally&#8221; select someone to be the White House&#8217;s cybersecurity coordinator, the position remains unfilled. </span></p>
<p>This symbolizes a lack of focus and prioritization &#8230;. why stick around when there is more focus, prioritization, and money in the private sector.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-8387695821429718924?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/another-top-cyber-security-official-resigns" rel='nofollow'>Another Top Cyber Security Official Resigns</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/another-top-cyber-security-official-resigns/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing Our Networks From Attacks Using BotNets</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/securing-our-networks-from-attacks-using-botnets</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/securing-our-networks-from-attacks-using-botnets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asking The Right Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balancing Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curtain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt;float: left;cursor: pointer;width: 300px;height: 200px" src="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%"><span style="font-weight: bold">BotNets Biggest Cyber Threat -- DoD Buzz</span></span><br /></div><br />The US has long pondered how best to use its offensive cyber capabilities and has long shied away from using them, fearful that we might pull down the Internet curtain on ourselves if we tried to wipe out an enemy’s networks. The New York Times ran a piece this weekend about just how daunting is this balancing act.<br /><br />The central point of the Times’ piece: “We knew we could pull it off — we had the tools,” said one senior official who worked at the Pentagon when the highly classified plan was developed.<br /><br />But the atta<span style="font-style: italic">ck never got the green light. Bush administration officials worried that the effects would not be limited to Iraq but would instead create worldwide financial havoc, spreading across the Middle East to Europe and perhaps to the United States.<br /></span><br /><a href="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">Update</span>: <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004963.html#comments">Securing Against BotNets </a>-- Defense tech<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">My Comment:</span> Kudos to both DoD Buzz and Defense Tech. They are asking the right questions.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/securing-our-networks-from-attacks-using-botnets">Securing Our Networks From Attacks Using BotNets</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 300px; height: 200px;" src="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">BotNets Biggest Cyber Threat &#8212; DoD Buzz</span></span></div>
<p>The US has long pondered how best to use its offensive cyber capabilities and has long shied away from using them, fearful that we might pull down the Internet curtain on ourselves if we tried to wipe out an enemy’s networks. The New York Times ran a piece this weekend about just how daunting is this balancing act.</p>
<p>The central point of the Times’ piece: “We knew we could pull it off — we had the tools,” said one senior official who worked at the Pentagon when the highly classified plan was developed.</p>
<p>But the atta<span style="font-style: italic;">ck never got the green light. Bush administration officials worried that the effects would not be limited to Iraq but would instead create worldwide financial havoc, spreading across the Middle East to Europe and perhaps to the United States.<br /></span><br /><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.defensetech.org/images/cyber-servers.jpg" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update</span>: <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004963.html#comments" rel='nofollow'>Securing Against BotNets </a>&#8211; Defense tech</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> Kudos to both DoD Buzz and Defense Tech. They are asking the right questions.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-3475612791359907355?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/securing-our-networks-from-attacks-using-botnets" rel='nofollow'>Securing Our Networks From Attacks Using BotNets</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/securing-our-networks-from-attacks-using-botnets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Cybersecurity Aide At White House Resigns</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/top-cybersecurity-aide-at-white-house-resigns</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/top-cybersecurity-aide-at-white-house-resigns#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Computer Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sng59Frn1aI/AAAAAAAAM3o/0BhYyI_rFF8/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px;text-align: center;cursor: pointer;width: 400px;height: 267px" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sng59Frn1aI/AAAAAAAAM3o/0BhYyI_rFF8/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">From The Washington </span><span style="font-weight: bold">Post</span>:<br /><br />The White House's senior aide on cybersecurity has decided to resign following delays in the appointment of a coordinator to spearhead the government's efforts to protect the nation's computer networks.<br /><br />Melissa E. Hathaway, who also served as a cybersecurity aide during the Bush administration, had been a contender for the position of cybersecurity coordinator. But in an interview Monday, she said she had withdrawn her application.<br /><br />"I wasn't willing to continue to wait any longer, because I'm not empowered right now to continue to drive the change," she said. "I've concluded that I can do more now from a different role," most likely in the private sector.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/03/AR2009080302697.html">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">My Comment:</span> There has always been a problem with cybersecurity policies/issues and  their implementations in past administrations ... and now (it appears) for this one also. A big speech is made, and there is little if any follow through.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/top-cybersecurity-aide-at-white-house-resigns">Top Cybersecurity Aide At White House Resigns</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sng59Frn1aI/AAAAAAAAM3o/0BhYyI_rFF8/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 267px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sng59Frn1aI/AAAAAAAAM3o/0BhYyI_rFF8/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5366102677671892386" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The Washington </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">Post</span>:</p>
<p>The White House&#8217;s senior aide on cybersecurity has decided to resign following delays in the appointment of a coordinator to spearhead the government&#8217;s efforts to protect the nation&#8217;s computer networks.</p>
<p>Melissa E. Hathaway, who also served as a cybersecurity aide during the Bush administration, had been a contender for the position of cybersecurity coordinator. But in an interview Monday, she said she had withdrawn her application.</p>
<p>&#8220;I wasn&#8217;t willing to continue to wait any longer, because I&#8217;m not empowered right now to continue to drive the change,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve concluded that I can do more now from a different role,&#8221; most likely in the private sector.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/03/AR2009080302697.html" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> There has always been a problem with cybersecurity policies/issues and  their implementations in past administrations &#8230; and now (it appears) for this one also. A big speech is made, and there is little if any follow through.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-7886740873664134678?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/top-cybersecurity-aide-at-white-house-resigns" rel='nofollow'>Top Cybersecurity Aide At White House Resigns</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/top-cybersecurity-aide-at-white-house-resigns/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Contest To Train Cyber Combatants</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/a-contest-to-train-cyber-combatants</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/a-contest-to-train-cyber-combatants#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1950s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center For Strategic And International Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combatants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intriguing Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Launch Of Sputnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Industry Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sans Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triathlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmuiIMpt0yI/AAAAAAAAMrg/CqTrJL1nI_E/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 270px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmuiIMpt0yI/AAAAAAAAMrg/CqTrJL1nI_E/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From Technology Review:</span><br /><br />Cyber-defense and capture-the-flag contests will help train future defenders of cyberspace.<br /><br />In the 1950s, shocked by the Russians' launch of Sputnik, the United States embarked on an initiative to boost its numbers of scientists and engineers. Now, private industry, academics, and government agencies are banding together to create a similar push to educate and train at least 10,000 students to become the future defenders of cyberspace.<br /><br />On Monday, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the SANS Institute, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and several university and private-industry partners plan to announce the U.S. Cyber Challenge, a triathlon of competitions designed to inspire students to learn the technical skills needed to defend--and, in some cases, attack--computer networks.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/web/23066/">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment</span>: Intriguing article .... I am sure there are going to be many applicants.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/a-contest-to-train-cyber-combatants">A Contest To Train Cyber Combatants</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmuiIMpt0yI/AAAAAAAAMrg/CqTrJL1nI_E/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 270px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmuiIMpt0yI/AAAAAAAAMrg/CqTrJL1nI_E/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5362558043033555746" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From Technology Review:</span></p>
<p>Cyber-defense and capture-the-flag contests will help train future defenders of cyberspace.</p>
<p>In the 1950s, shocked by the Russians&#8217; launch of Sputnik, the United States embarked on an initiative to boost its numbers of scientists and engineers. Now, private industry, academics, and government agencies are banding together to create a similar push to educate and train at least 10,000 students to become the future defenders of cyberspace.</p>
<p>On Monday, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the SANS Institute, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and several university and private-industry partners plan to announce the U.S. Cyber Challenge, a triathlon of competitions designed to inspire students to learn the technical skills needed to defend&#8211;and, in some cases, attack&#8211;computer networks.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.technologyreview.com/web/23066/" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment</span>: Intriguing article &#8230;. I am sure there are going to be many applicants.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-8863318520902056996?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/a-contest-to-train-cyber-combatants" rel='nofollow'>A Contest To Train Cyber Combatants</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/a-contest-to-train-cyber-combatants/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shortage Of Cyber Experts May Hinder Govt</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/shortage-of-cyber-experts-may-hinder-govt</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/shortage-of-cyber-experts-may-hinder-govt#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ap Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Specialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross Purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberattacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korean Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertical Type]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmdycntiHcI/AAAAAAAAMnw/-Sjju0iDTVo/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmdycntiHcI/AAAAAAAAMnw/-Sjju0iDTVo/s200/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">From AP:</span><br /><br />WASHINGTON — Federal agencies are facing a severe shortage of computer specialists, even as a growing wave of coordinated cyberattacks against the government poses potential national security risks, a private study found.<br /><br />The study describes a fragmented federal cyber force, where no one is in charge of overall planning and government agencies are "on their own and sometimes working at cross purposes or in competition with one another."<br /><br />The report, scheduled to be released Wednesday, arrives in the wake of a series of cyberattacks this month that shut down some U.S. and South Korean government and financial Web sites.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hGjjgS3v7dtZdsIH4zN09ASyyETQD99JCFC84">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> The reason(s) why computer specialists are not rushing to apply for jobs with the government are multiple .... but the main reasons are (1) pay .... there is more money in the private sector. (2) Computer geeks have a culture of working the hours that they want .... government operates slightly differently. (3) Politics and bureaucracy .... two environments that computer specialists stay away from (another cultural component of the field). (4) The best in the computer industry respond negatively to bureaucracy and a vertical type of management of management structure .... government is all vertical.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/shortage-of-cyber-experts-may-hinder-govt">Shortage Of Cyber Experts May Hinder Govt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmdycntiHcI/AAAAAAAAMnw/-Sjju0iDTVo/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SmdycntiHcI/AAAAAAAAMnw/-Sjju0iDTVo/s200/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5361379717429730754" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">From AP:</span></p>
<p>WASHINGTON — Federal agencies are facing a severe shortage of computer specialists, even as a growing wave of coordinated cyberattacks against the government poses potential national security risks, a private study found.</p>
<p>The study describes a fragmented federal cyber force, where no one is in charge of overall planning and government agencies are &#8220;on their own and sometimes working at cross purposes or in competition with one another.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report, scheduled to be released Wednesday, arrives in the wake of a series of cyberattacks this month that shut down some U.S. and South Korean government and financial Web sites.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hGjjgS3v7dtZdsIH4zN09ASyyETQD99JCFC84" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> The reason(s) why computer specialists are not rushing to apply for jobs with the government are multiple &#8230;. but the main reasons are (1) pay &#8230;. there is more money in the private sector. (2) Computer geeks have a culture of working the hours that they want &#8230;. government operates slightly differently. (3) Politics and bureaucracy &#8230;. two environments that computer specialists stay away from (another cultural component of the field). (4) The best in the computer industry respond negatively to bureaucracy and a vertical type of management of management structure &#8230;. government is all vertical.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-1519139574793459169?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/shortage-of-cyber-experts-may-hinder-govt" rel='nofollow'>Shortage Of Cyber Experts May Hinder Govt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/shortage-of-cyber-experts-may-hinder-govt/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popular Mechanic&#8217;s GuideTo Cyber Security In The U.S.</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/popular-mechanics-guideto-cyber-security-in-the-u-s</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/popular-mechanics-guideto-cyber-security-in-the-u-s#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnegie Mellon University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Harrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connection Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial Of Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial Of Service Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Overtones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Mechanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korean Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Department Of Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/connection-map-0908.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 470px; height: 313px;" src="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/connection-map-0908.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">(Connection density map by Chris Harrison/Carnegie Mellon University)</span><br /></div><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From Popular Mechanics:</span><br /><br />A major denial-of-service attack on American and South Korean government sites—suspected but unproven harassment by North Korea—has raised the specter of cyber vulnerability. Twenty-six sites, including those operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, Defense Department and the Federal Trade Commission, were affected. While the attack itself, a type which uses hijacked personal computers to overload target networks with data, is unsophisticated, the scope of the effort and the apparent political overtones are alarming. Still, none of this is news to us; PM has covered cyber-security incidents ranging from threats to oil pipelines to compromised personal electronics. Here is a compilation of our past coverage.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4324262.html">Read more</a> ....<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/popular-mechanics-guideto-cyber-security-in-the-u-s">Popular Mechanic&#8217;s GuideTo Cyber Security In The U.S.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/connection-map-0908.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 470px; height: 313px;" src="http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/connection-map-0908.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">(Connection density map by Chris Harrison/Carnegie Mellon University)</span></div>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">From Popular Mechanics:</span></p>
<p>A major denial-of-service attack on American and South Korean government sites—suspected but unproven harassment by North Korea—has raised the specter of cyber vulnerability. Twenty-six sites, including those operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, Defense Department and the Federal Trade Commission, were affected. While the attack itself, a type which uses hijacked personal computers to overload target networks with data, is unsophisticated, the scope of the effort and the apparent political overtones are alarming. Still, none of this is news to us; PM has covered cyber-security incidents ranging from threats to oil pipelines to compromised personal electronics. Here is a compilation of our past coverage.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/4324262.html" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-7160691679485836109?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/popular-mechanics-guideto-cyber-security-in-the-u-s" rel='nofollow'>Popular Mechanic&#8217;s GuideTo Cyber Security In The U.S.</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/popular-mechanics-guideto-cyber-security-in-the-u-s/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybersecurity Plan To Involve NSA, Telecoms</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/cybersecurity-plan-to-involve-nsa-telecoms</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/cybersecurity-plan-to-involve-nsa-telecoms#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency Assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dhs Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Former Government Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sk5nmN8U-LI/AAAAAAAAMPs/_7S7uM0eRb0/s1600-h/photo1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 250px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sk5nmN8U-LI/AAAAAAAAMPs/_7S7uM0eRb0/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The Washington Post:</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">DHS Officials Debating The Privacy Implications.</span><br /><br />The Obama administration will proceed with a Bush-era plan to use National Security Agency assistance in screening government computer traffic on private-sector networks, with AT&#38;T as the likely test site, according to three current and former government officials.<br /><br />President Obama said in May that government efforts to protect computer systems from attack would not involve "monitoring private-sector networks or Internet traffic," and Department of Homeland Security officials say the new program will scrutinize only data going to or from government systems.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070202771.html">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment</span>: When President Bush's administration proposed this a few years ago .... there were howls (and I agreed with these howls) from the left.<br /><br />Today .... I hear tumbleweeds.<br /><br />I now realize that the battle is lost .... and all in the name of national security. Jefferson was right .... people will always give up their liberty for security.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/cybersecurity-plan-to-involve-nsa-telecoms">Cybersecurity Plan To Involve NSA, Telecoms</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sk5nmN8U-LI/AAAAAAAAMPs/_7S7uM0eRb0/s1600-h/photo1.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 250px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/Sk5nmN8U-LI/AAAAAAAAMPs/_7S7uM0eRb0/s400/photo1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5354330913265481906" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The Washington Post:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">DHS Officials Debating The Privacy Implications.</span></p>
<p>The Obama administration will proceed with a Bush-era plan to use National Security Agency assistance in screening government computer traffic on private-sector networks, with AT&amp;T as the likely test site, according to three current and former government officials.</p>
<p>President Obama said in May that government efforts to protect computer systems from attack would not involve &#8220;monitoring private-sector networks or Internet traffic,&#8221; and Department of Homeland Security officials say the new program will scrutinize only data going to or from government systems.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070202771.html" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment</span>: When President Bush&#8217;s administration proposed this a few years ago &#8230;. there were howls (and I agreed with these howls) from the left.</p>
<p>Today &#8230;. I hear tumbleweeds.</p>
<p>I now realize that the battle is lost &#8230;. and all in the name of national security. Jefferson was right &#8230;. people will always give up their liberty for security.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-8783405856300948301?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/cybersecurity-plan-to-involve-nsa-telecoms" rel='nofollow'>Cybersecurity Plan To Involve NSA, Telecoms</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/cybersecurity-plan-to-involve-nsa-telecoms/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. And Russia Differ On A Treaty For Cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-and-russia-differ-on-a-treaty-for-cyberspace</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-and-russia-differ-on-a-treaty-for-cyberspace#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battleground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tallinn Estonia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.650.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 650px; height: 450px;" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.650.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">A ceremony at a Soviet war statue in Tallinn, Estonia, in 2007. The decision to move the statue from the city center to a military cemetery enraged Russia and Russian Estonians. It was followed by a crippling, monthlong siege of Estonian computer networks. NIPA, via Associated Press</span><br /></div><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The New York Times:</span><br /><br />The United States and Russia are locked in a fundamental dispute over how to counter the growing threat of cyberwar attacks that could wreak havoc on computer systems and the Internet.<br /><br />Both nations agree that cyberspace is an emerging battleground. The two sides are expected to address the subject when President Obama visits Russia next week and at the General Assembly of the United Nations in November, according to a senior State Department official.<br /><br />But there the agreement ends.<br /><br />Russia favors an international treaty along the lines of those negotiated for chemical weapons and has pushed for that approach at a series of meetings this year and in public statements by a high-ranking official.<br /><br />The United States argues that a treaty is unnecessary. It instead advocates improved cooperation among international law enforcement groups. If these groups cooperate to make cyberspace more secure against criminal intrusions, their work will also make cyberspace more secure against military campaigns, American officials say.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.html?hp"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Read more</span></a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> The Russian proposal is not workable. It would only take one nation and/or network in the world that does not fall under the purview of an international treaty, and it will be from there that cyber attacks and criminal enterprises will flourish. The U.S. approach towards law enforcement is also a stop-gap measure. It cannot prosecute rogue nations and networks since they are operating out of the jurisdiction of U.S. law.<br /><br />So what is the solution .... hmmmm ..... unless we want to alter how the internet works (a recommendation that I would not agree to), there is no solution at the present time.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-and-russia-differ-on-a-treaty-for-cyberspace">U.S. And Russia Differ On A Treaty For Cyberspace</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.650.jpg" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 650px; height: 450px;" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.650.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">A ceremony at a Soviet war statue in Tallinn, Estonia, in 2007. The decision to move the statue from the city center to a military cemetery enraged Russia and Russian Estonians. It was followed by a crippling, monthlong siege of Estonian computer networks. NIPA, via Associated Press</span></div>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The New York Times:</span></p>
<p>The United States and Russia are locked in a fundamental dispute over how to counter the growing threat of cyberwar attacks that could wreak havoc on computer systems and the Internet.</p>
<p>Both nations agree that cyberspace is an emerging battleground. The two sides are expected to address the subject when President Obama visits Russia next week and at the General Assembly of the United Nations in November, according to a senior State Department official.</p>
<p>But there the agreement ends.</p>
<p>Russia favors an international treaty along the lines of those negotiated for chemical weapons and has pushed for that approach at a series of meetings this year and in public statements by a high-ranking official.</p>
<p>The United States argues that a treaty is unnecessary. It instead advocates improved cooperation among international law enforcement groups. If these groups cooperate to make cyberspace more secure against criminal intrusions, their work will also make cyberspace more secure against military campaigns, American officials say.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/world/28cyber.html?hp" rel='nofollow'><span style="font-weight: bold;">Read more</span></a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> The Russian proposal is not workable. It would only take one nation and/or network in the world that does not fall under the purview of an international treaty, and it will be from there that cyber attacks and criminal enterprises will flourish. The U.S. approach towards law enforcement is also a stop-gap measure. It cannot prosecute rogue nations and networks since they are operating out of the jurisdiction of U.S. law.</p>
<p>So what is the solution &#8230;. hmmmm &#8230;.. unless we want to alter how the internet works (a recommendation that I would not agree to), there is no solution at the present time.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-3582600447137630284?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-and-russia-differ-on-a-treaty-for-cyberspace" rel='nofollow'>U.S. And Russia Differ On A Treaty For Cyberspace</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-and-russia-differ-on-a-treaty-for-cyberspace/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Cyber Weapons: The Toothless Threat?</title>
		<link>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-cyber-weapons-the-toothless-threat</link>
		<comments>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-cyber-weapons-the-toothless-threat#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookyards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial Of Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Quicksand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warfighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SjrnDMXf3kI/AAAAAAAAL5E/EQnlkANVHI8/s1600-h/photo+1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SjrnDMXf3kI/AAAAAAAAL5E/EQnlkANVHI8/s200/photo+1.png" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The Ares Blog/Aviation Week:</span><br /><br />A senior U.S. Air Force warfighting commander recently talked with Aviation Week about some of the weaponry that can used against cyber targets. At his disposal, as an airpower commander, is an arsenal that doesn’t intrude into the murky ethical and legal quicksand of cascading computer network attacks.<br /><br />Some of it is familiar kinetic weaponry that you would not normally associate with cyber-warfare. Other capabilities fall in the specialties of jamming, denial of service, exploitation and false-target generation.<br /><br />What he can’t use are digital weapons that can launch pre-emptive cyber attacks to ward off those seeking to damage or exploit the country's digitally dependent organizations. Ironically, there is pressure to create even better, "game-changing" technologies.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#38;plckScript=blogScript&#38;plckElementId=blogDest&#38;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#38;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a0c26cfe4-d66c-4eee-872a-aa2a5dc66001">Read more</a> ....<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> Sounds typical .... the troops have the will and the tools to fight any threat .... but Washington has other priorities.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'/></div><p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-cyber-weapons-the-toothless-threat">U.S. Cyber Weapons: The Toothless Threat?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com">Updated News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SjrnDMXf3kI/AAAAAAAAL5E/EQnlkANVHI8/s1600-h/photo+1.png" rel='nofollow'><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PG3ew_iFi3A/SjrnDMXf3kI/AAAAAAAAL5E/EQnlkANVHI8/s200/photo+1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5348841549501292098" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">From The Ares Blog/Aviation Week:</span></p>
<p>A senior U.S. Air Force warfighting commander recently talked with Aviation Week about some of the weaponry that can used against cyber targets. At his disposal, as an airpower commander, is an arsenal that doesn’t intrude into the murky ethical and legal quicksand of cascading computer network attacks.</p>
<p>Some of it is familiar kinetic weaponry that you would not normally associate with cyber-warfare. Other capabilities fall in the specialties of jamming, denial of service, exploitation and false-target generation.</p>
<p>What he can’t use are digital weapons that can launch pre-emptive cyber attacks to ward off those seeking to damage or exploit the country&#8217;s digitally dependent organizations. Ironically, there is pressure to create even better, &#8220;game-changing&#8221; technologies.</p>
<p><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a0c26cfe4-d66c-4eee-872a-aa2a5dc66001" rel='nofollow'>Read more</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">My Comment:</span> Sounds typical &#8230;. the troops have the will and the tools to fight any threat &#8230;. but Washington has other priorities.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8519488391496270073-431714404941116578?l=warnewsupdates.blogspot.com'/></div>
<p><a href="http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-cyber-weapons-the-toothless-threat" rel='nofollow'>U.S. Cyber Weapons: The Toothless Threat?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://updatedfrequently.com" rel='nofollow'>Updated News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://updatedfrequently.com/u-s-cyber-weapons-the-toothless-threat/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
